Gamergate

Brief overview of Gamergate:

“#GamerGate” is an online movement ostensibly concerned with ethics in game journalism and with protecting the “gamer” identity.

Many involved with the Gamergate hashtag have said that they are concerned with ethics in video game journalism; members launched a campaign to convince ad providers to pull support from sites critical of Gamergate. This campaign and others like it have been widely criticized in the media as evidence that the ethics concerns are a front for a culture war against the diversification of video game demographics. The old guys want to lockout the young bucks.

One of the articles said that it is mainly old white men who are engineering the games.  It didn’t say whether or not those are the game’s creator, but knowing that is a bit of a controversy in itself.  People that have an ability to think like the generation following theirs are rare.  That said, old engineers are likely not as in touch with the new games as we “kids” would like them to be.  Young game designers are popping up, but big companies employing these guys will keep the young kids at odds who are trying to come up to the big stage and engineer these games.

The next issue: are games damaging my kid’s future?

 Imagine that teenagers who were too shy or awkward to say a word to their peers and too apathetic to say a word to their parents spent hours and hours every night watching these newfangled movies. We might have questions. What weird things were happening in their brains, with all of this violent make-believe?  We really don’t know.  Grand Theft Auto has been proven to incite violence.  Is that the game we are talking about though?  We know shooting games aren’t the best, but RPG games could add values to kids who won’t find them elsewhere.
Playing sports gives you teamwork and membership.  RPG can do the same thing.  There aren’t a ton of avenues for those abilities.  Gaming is very different from Gamergate, but these values are understood by the young bucks who are being discriminated against in Gamergate.
Gamergate seems to be a group of young individuals pissed off about people that hold power over them.  What’s new kids?  It’s difficult when you know you have the ability but you aren’t handed the job because they trust the people they have.  The older guys working in  conjunction with these corporate game makers are given the benefit of the doubt, while we still have to fight to gain credibility.  Someday the table will turn and we will be the ones who don’t understand the next generation.  What would you do?  Would you get out of the way?

The 2004 election dawned a new era of Presidential elections.  It was labeled the inaugural ‘digital age’ election.  One writer was quoted asking when the first video game simulating an election would come out.  The contributors to this article came up with the video game before the writer had pondered when such a game would hit the stores.

Howard Dean was a Governor of Vermont and attempted to become the Democratic nomination for President.  He failed, as many of us know.  John Kerry eventually lost the election, despite winning the popular vote, to George W. Bush.  Dean’s methods were new-age and that is mainly what this piece is about… thus New Media Writing.  It sparked use of technology.

“Dean was incredibly successful in changing the way political campaigns of all types are carried out. Dean supporters made extensive use of new media tools such as e-mail, Web sites, and blogs to foster support from the grassroots. Howard Dean was also the first candidate to use a video game as endorsed political speech.”  The guy used a video game to market his election— not sure that has ever been done again.

As big of a joke as the game seemed initially, it actually reached a good chunk of voters.  “It was very successful in terms of audience: it reached 100,000 plays in the month before the Iowa caucus, a very respectable number considering its novelty and the fact that it was launched during the holidays.”  Timing is everything isn’t it?  Really makes you think.  Like don’t ya just hate it when you put out a Facebook post and then you see that the post put up seconds after yours published is way funnier or reaches a better audience… ughhhh.

Okay back to politics and writing.  Here is how the game worked.

“This effectiveness was based on the player’s performance in each minigame; a better score meant a more efficient supporter. Because supporters could not be “reset” once placed, this encouraged players to perform their best each time they played a minigame. After having set the effectiveness of a supporter through one of the minigames, that supporter worked nonstop, enacting “virtual outreach” to win over other virtual Iowans. In the main map screen, more effective virtual supporters worked more quickly in their region; a circular gauge showed their progress. When the gauge filled, a new supporter spawned, ready for the player to place for additional outreach.”

I wouldn’t want my Presidential candidate to do video games as part of his election.  Generally, it’s only kids that play video games and no kids want to play video games that are about an election.  Or if they do play that game it means that they are already voting, because they are the kids who care enough to play a lame game about an election.  Sometimes the truth is harsh.  It’s not the way to appeal to your people, because it is such a sad attempt and kids won’t go for it.  E-mail and rallies seem like the best use of time and it will be that way for an awfully long time.

From Work To Play

I agree that there is a consensus for change growing among some of those concerned with creative work in digital media.  It is ever changing with new sites popping up every hour.  There may not be enough money in digital media.  It is not evenly distributed.  It is a make it or suffer the consequences of living paycheck to paycheck business.

I am involved in that business now with the Fox News affiliate in town.  I see it everyday how poorly the money is distributed.  Fox’s billion dollar business doesn’t extend to its private owners of various news stations.

If you know the money won’t be distributed equally in digital media, then why not have fun with it.  Maybe a positive outlook will make you rise or spark someone else to rise near you.  It may look like All Work No Play, but I would have to argue that is completely wrong to a trained eye.

An untrained eye sees senseless Youtube videos being distributed around digital media, but a trained eye sees its true meaning, which is networking.  This generation can’t be judged on the outside looking in.

Networks have to be maintained.  Like recruiting in college sports an individual can chose to opt out of an agreement unless they sign documents declaring their full commitment.  These private owners in digital media will fight and fight against each other until best wins.  The truest science will run its course and that’s evolution.

This is where the divide begins.  When you lose those relationships you needed to maintain you are back to eating ramen for lunch 2-3 days a week.  When this happens you have to keep fully committed or you have to jump ship and scrap what you can.  The old cliche ‘you won’t know until you try’ is so harshly true sometimes.

“If I throw a ball at you I don’t expect you to drop it and wait until it starts telling stories.”

You need to take chances and do things for yourself.  The ball won’t start talking. It’s the only way to find out if you can do it.